The kind of incitement, racism and hatred inherent in Islam – but which is always filtered out by the liberal media and leftist politicians as a matter of course – brought to you from Hamastan, straight from the horse’s mouth:
Only Jews who lived in ‘Palestine’ (as Arabs call the Land of Israel) before World War I will be allowed to live in the future Islamic ‘Palestinian’ state, a senior Hamas official said in an interview published Thursday. This would mean that no Jews aged currently under 96 would qualify for living in that state, regardless of where they are from.
The interviewer for pan-Arab newspaper Al-Hayyat asked terrorist official Kahlil Al-Haya if Hamas wants Gaza to become an Islamic emirate. Al-Haya answered in the negative and explained that Gaza will be part of a future state of Palestine, “between the [Mediterranean] Sea and the [Jordan] River.”
“We have faith in our Islamic, Arab and Palestinian belief that Palestine will be returned to its inhabitants and that the Zionist existence will end,” he stated. “The meaning of a Palestinian state is that there will be one united state, an Islamic Palestine… that will unite the Palestinians. The Jews will have no rights in it, except those who lived on the land of Palestine before World War I.”
Al-Haya also said that Iranian support for Hamas is not complicated by the fact that Iranians belong to the Shiite stream of Islam, while Gazans are from the competing Sunni stream. “We told [the Iranians] in the clearest manner that we will not agree under any condition for the Shi’ite stream to enter our land,” he stressed.
So. No Jews. No Iranians. And almost certainly no other form of filthy kuffar, (unless Hamas somehow manage to make the Sharia hellhole they have made Gaza attractive to paying tourists – and as you know, Muslims love tourists.
But wait a minute. Surely some mistake here? Al-Haya is clearly forgetting the words of one of his illustrious Jihadist predecessors in the PLO:
“The Palestinian people [do] not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism.
For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa. While as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan”. PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein – interviewed by the Dutch newspaper Trouw in 1977
There you have it. There is no (nor has there ever been) a ‘Palestinian state’. There are no ‘Palestinian people’.
So it’s perhaps a little premature to be talking already about the racist, apartheid immigration requirements you will impose in future ‘Palestine’, whilst similtaneously accusing Israel of being a racist, apardheid ‘Zionist entity’ (albeit one most Israeli Arabs still say that they would never wish to leave).